From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25088: 25.1; feature-unload and reload of cl-defstruct fails Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:18:29 +0200 Message-ID: <8337hwgsl6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eg1qhpjf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg1qoiiv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3zwfxjn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83pol8l62j.fsf@gnu.org> <87shpxelkj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83vauth5p9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481354361 18594 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2016 07:19:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 07:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 25088@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 08:19:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbwA-0003Gf-QY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:19:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbwB-00073s-M1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbw1-0006yi-BV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbvy-0007d9-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbvy-0007d5-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbvx-0007Pd-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 07:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25088 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25088-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25088.148135428928428 (code B ref 25088); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 07:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25088) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2016 07:18:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbv6-0007OR-S0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbv4-0007O9-SL for 25088@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbuw-0007OM-JO for 25088@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:18:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbuw-0007OI-GN; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4957 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbuv-0001gl-IT; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:17:58 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:33:57 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126791 Archived-At: > Cc: 25088@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:33:57 +0200 > > On 09.12.2016 10:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > What do others think? Is the patch proposed by Noam safe enough for > > the release branch? Stefan? Dmitry? > > Personally, the first option sounds safer for me (for the release > branch), because the other one might affect many packages and not just > this one. By "first option" do you mean the original patch posted by Noam? If so, given a similar opinion from Stefan, let's install that on emacs-25.