From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32747: 26; `C-M-w M-w' with non-nil `mouse-drag-copy-region', if selected with mouse Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:44:33 +0300 Message-ID: <8336u3e4dq.fsf@gnu.org> References: >>>>> <83tvmlew2a.fsf@gnu.org>>>>>> <932a1915-c043-4708-9f16-dc0ee8fafdb3@default>>>>> <83pnx9een5.fsf@gnu.org>>>>> <01b0f0c4-e3b8-440f-a739-5995ca4ff615@default>>>> <83o9cte392.fsf@gnu.org>>>> <9136cccc-7e97-4a74-89a9-00eccab73c32@default>>> <4394ff48-2444-4a9b-b635-e96e66a30cba@default>>> <83a7obexed.fsf@gnu.org>>> <1254fccb-35ae-4c51-8471-e01844f64517@default>> <834lejevn7.fsf@gnu.org>> <87efdnq0g9.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537512193 2474 195.159.176.226 (21 Sep 2018 06:43:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32747@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 21 08:43:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3F9b-0000Sg-J8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:43:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBi-0007zP-6b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBa-0007zG-IG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBW-0008Uc-Lt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBW-0008UY-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBW-00035S-FV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32747 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32747-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32747.153751229811841 (code B ref 32747); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2018 06:44:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBR-00034v-W8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:44:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBQ-00034i-LX for 32747@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBI-000849-D2 for 32747@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBI-00083S-4g; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:44:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3325 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g3FBG-0004F3-SJ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:44:48 -0400 In-reply-to: <87efdnq0g9.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:16:22 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150514 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 32747@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:16:22 -0400 > > I guess the lesson here is to always send the retitling action to > the bug thread in addition to control. I'll remember for next time. Alternatively, there's nothing wrong with replying to the bug address alone, when there's no clear-cut addressee.