From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37819: [PATCH] Make 'load-dangerous-libraries' obsolete Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 09:30:12 +0300 Message-ID: <8336fp8cy3.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="54861"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37819@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 19 08:31:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiGg-000E9U-IG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiGf-0000ex-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiGV-0000ee-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiGU-0005u5-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiGU-0005u0-0w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiGT-0005q8-T3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 06:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37819 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37819-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37819.157146663022391 (code B ref 37819); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 06:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37819) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2019 06:30:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiFy-0005p4-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiFw-0005on-BE for 37819@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:30:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiFr-0005UF-72; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4829 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iLiFq-0007Wv-G3; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:30:22 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:09:59 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169701 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:09:59 +0200 > > I suspect that 'load-dangerous-libraries' is largely irrelevant > nowadays. Is this correct? If yes, here is a patch which would > ignore it and declare it obsolete. What is the purpose of declaring this obsolete? I'd argue we should keep this "forever", since it can never do any harm, and sometimes might do an important job.