From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37826: Very annoying autoraise client/server behavior with -t option Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:19:30 +0300 Message-ID: <8336fm2hrh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tv84540m.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9si2y9u.fsf@gnu.org> <83a79u2oih.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="89194"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37826@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 21 18:20:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPl-000N4f-BT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:20:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44924 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPj-0000H2-Q1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPc-0000Eu-45 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPa-0007sP-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPa-0007sL-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPa-0006dL-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37826 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37826-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37826.157167478625471 (code B ref 37826); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2019 16:19:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPK-0006cl-Eg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55475) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPG-0006cS-C4 for 37826@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:19:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPB-0007nt-8D; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:19:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4148 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iMaPA-0000Ug-7i; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:19:36 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Carlos Pita on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:52:57 -0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169924 Archived-At: > From: Carlos Pita > Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:52:57 -0300 > Cc: 37826@debbugs.gnu.org > > Also I'm seeing that advicing `message` doesn't affect yes/no > questions, seems to follow a completely different code path. My main > concern regarding delaying messages were related to these kind of > interactions with the user. If that's not a concern, maybe all > non-interactive messages could be easily delayed, after all. AFAIK, questions like that are asked after creating a new frame, so if you know otherwise, please tell the details.