From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41506: 28.0.50; RTL problem Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 11:35:06 +0300 Message-ID: <833678a8xx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838shhxuff.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuztctpk.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftbdcmm3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k10kzkv3.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="107683"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41506@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 06 10:36:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUJJ-000Rw3-Hp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 10:36:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUJI-00021O-Gp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUJB-00021F-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUJ8-0003oR-IA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUJ8-0006fI-F4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41506 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 41506-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41506.159143252225564 (code B ref 41506); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41506) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2020 08:35:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUIU-0006eF-70 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:35:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUIS-0006e2-Ts for 41506@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUIN-0003di-LS; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3867 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jhUIM-0006hY-SG; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:35:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k10kzkv3.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 06 Jun 2020 07:58:24 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181595 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Cc: 41506@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 07:58:24 +0000 > > when we're called with bidi_it->first_elt = true, it's possible we > shouldn't touch bidi_it->new_paragraph at all... Can you elaborate on why you think that? first_elt can be set when we are at the beginning of a paragraph or when we are in the middle of it, so its meaning is different from that of new_paragraph. > + paragraph might start. But don't do that for the first > + element since this function will be called twice in that > + case. */ Which code causes the two calls, and why is that significant in this case?