From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days? Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:09:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83363rkmwg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <708ten8bam.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83shcu3mtf.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6357"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 15803@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 09 17:10:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1jd-0001Vg-MK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44030 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1jc-0007PD-P9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1jW-0007No-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1jW-0003AT-Dn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1jW-0002pf-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15803 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 15803-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15803.159966415010823 (code B ref 15803); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 15:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32900 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1ig-0002oU-7e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1ie-0002oI-Rw for 15803@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1iZ-000361-IZ; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4116 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kG1iY-00012v-83; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:09:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 9 Sep 2020 06:33:11 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187668 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 06:33:11 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 15803@debbugs.gnu.org > > Glenn Morris writes: > > > BTW, it feels very dated to me to have discussion of Windows 9X in the > > Emacs manual section on file-name-coding. > > Agreed. Could we move this discussion to the MS Windows FAQ instead? I don't think the FAQ is the right place for this information. So no, please don't move it to the FAQ. But we could move this to the MS-Windows appendix, leaving a cross-reference where the text is now.