From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43307: 28.0.50; `diff-no-select': no documentation for BUF argument Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:48:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83363oh43d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r1r94a41.fsf@gnus.org> <834ko4j16t.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5wxzuj.fsf@gnus.org> <838sdgh4kh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu1wxz9l.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2738"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 14:49:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiUI-0000bS-0r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:49:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiUH-00010Y-0o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiUA-0000z9-Ev for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiUA-0003TE-3z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiUA-0006r5-2a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43307 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 43307-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43307.159982849726290 (code B ref 43307); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:48:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTR-0006px-EP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTP-0006pZ-Fq for 43307@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTJ-0003N6-Vo; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2563 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiTJ-0000XS-1Y; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:48:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mu1wxz9l.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:40:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187832 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 43307@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:40:22 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think you forgot to push... > > Indeed. Now pushed. Thanks, LGTM. Although I would add that SWITCHES should be a list of command-line switches. And yes, let's backport this to the release branch. I agree that this is not very important, but backporting is easy.