From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43572: Feature request: make it possible to choose whether the first lines of the minibuffer should be displayed instead of the last ones Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:11:33 +0300 Message-ID: <833633nqru.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834knnuugm.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7rnt8s3.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34424"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, 43572@debbugs.gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 27 18:12:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHW-0008rP-C7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:12:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHV-0003ru-DG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHO-0003rk-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHN-0001Uv-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHN-0005rZ-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43572 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43572-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43572.160122311522522 (code B ref 43572); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43572) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2020 16:11:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHG-0005rB-LE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZHE-0005qt-KN for 43572@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZH9-0001Oo-2V; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2033 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZH8-0008IZ-EI; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83h7rnt8s3.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:54:36 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189147 Archived-At: Ping! > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:54:36 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: ghe@sdf.org, 43572@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Cc: Gregory Heytings , 43572@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:40:59 -0400 > > > > > So I agree with Stefan that the text inserted into the minibuffer > > > should itself indicate to the display engine that it wants to be > > > displayed starting at BOB. That way we don't have to worry about > > > inadvertently affecting other users of the mini-window. > > > > It might be difficult/inconvenient to have the info directly in the > > text, tho. > > I don't think I see why it would be difficult/inconvenient. Can you > explain? > > > How 'bout using a window-parameter whose value should be an overlay > > indicating the "area of focus", and then only obey this parameter if: > > - the overlay is in the buffer that's being displayed. > > - and window-point is lies within this overlay. > > This sounds like the same idea of a text property, only with an > overlay and a more complicated test for applicability. When I said > "text property", I meant both text and overlay property, so if you > think your proposal above is less difficult/inconvenient, then using > just an overlay would be even simpler, no? Or what am I missing? > > > One more thing: there's a good argument to make that icomplete-vertical > > should list the completions *above* the minibuffer's prompt rather than > > below (so as not to affect the positions of the minibuffer's prompt so > > much). But in that case, the part of the overlay's after/before string > > (when too long) which should be truncated (when the mini-window is too > > small) is the beginning, whereas IIUC the current redisplay is unable to > > display "the end" of an overlay's after/before string unless it also > > shows its beginning. > > Yes, we cannot start a window's display in the middle of an overlay > string. > > In general, display and overlay strings were not intended for 75% > (maybe more) of the uses they get nowadays, and it shows.