From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43755: 27.1; Electric-buffer-list does not work with global-display-line-numbers-mode Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:26:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83362wg3o2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4815311E-6DB3-4C36-A807-7FD229B2F305@gmail.com> <838scog6jx.fsf@gnu.org> <6D516CF1-C9E0-4145-9856-7FDDC2A0547A@gmail.com> <834kncg4gs.fsf@gnu.org> <875z7sydk9.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34345"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43755@debbugs.gnu.org, superdorodoro3@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 15:27:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL5Z-0008iR-Mm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:27:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39292 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL5Y-00048Z-A4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL5S-00048P-IA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL5S-0004Fl-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL5S-0000p7-48 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43755 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 43755-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43755.16016451813119 (code B ref 43755); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43755) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2020 13:26:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL4m-0000oE-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:26:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL4j-0000o0-Fa for 43755@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL4a-0004C4-NI; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3015 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kOL4Z-00060k-Q9; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:26:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875z7sydk9.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:15:02 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189646 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: superdorodor3 , 43755@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:15:02 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This is already fixed on the master branch. Hmm... what change fixed > > that, I wonder? > > d037a6a2e6f92d793b1d5403dea4c7d3ca70883c Ah, thanks. I think we should cherry-pick this to emacs-27. > It fixes the symptom, but it would perhaps be interesting to see what it > is with display-line-numbers-mode that made this command behave oddly. > On the other hand, I thought the command itself was implemented so > peculiarly that it may not be worth poking into. I tend to agree.