From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:04:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83360ytqk3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837dqatsjd.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30318"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44854@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 22:05:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khfUx-0007m5-20 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:05:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42064 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khfUw-0002dd-4K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:05:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khfUl-0002dV-3P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khfUk-00025T-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khfUk-0002w9-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44854 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44854-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44854.160625186411243 (code B ref 44854); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2020 21:04:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khfU7-0002vG-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khfU3-0002v0-4w for 44854@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khfTx-0001z9-6H; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:04:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3443 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1khfTw-0004bx-E0; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:04:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:46:39 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194124 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:46:39 -0800 > Cc: 44854@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Does anyone have any objections to, or see any problems with adding the > >> lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, as in the attached patch? > > > > What are the benefits from doing so? > > AFAICT, there are no immediate practical benefits. But if we ever want > to have lexical-binding enabled by default, many things will have to be > done. This is just another (admittedly small) step on that long journey. I guess I'm asking how is this a step on that journey. Can you elaborate?