From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47616: 27.1; hardening mail-envelope-from Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:33:03 +0300 Message-ID: <8335uydbio.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v98z60u4.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> <87h7jgxite.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6p8ukf6.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> <877dkavlmg.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10319"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47616@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 07 13:34:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leykD-0002Za-Vu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:34:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leykD-00012E-2b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leyk6-00011w-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leyk6-00026z-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leyk6-0005iR-Gz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 11:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47616 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 47616-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47616.162038720121960 (code B ref 47616); Fri, 07 May 2021 11:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47616) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2021 11:33:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leyjQ-0005i8-Tv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:33:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leyjP-0005i1-25 for 47616@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:33:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leyjI-0001cm-S1; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4663 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leyjI-0002kf-GY; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:33:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877dkavlmg.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 07 May 2021 13:17:27 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205921 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 13:17:27 +0200 > Cc: 47616@debbugs.gnu.org > > Francesco Potortì writes: > > > That makes sense, in principle. I would argue for adding a comment to > > mail-envelope-from stating that since it calls mail-fetch-field it > > should be called only after narrowing to the headers. Or maybe even > > adding a note in the doc string, as done in mail-fetch-field. > > Good idea. I've now mentioned this in the doc string in Emacs 28. Did you forget to push?