From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9034: point adjustment (with invisible text) moves to the next line Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:46:37 +0300 Message-ID: <8335qwtdia.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87iprb38sa.fsf@gmail.com> <87tujd32pc.fsf@gnus.org> <834kbdv5jd.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg82u6n.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34210"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com, 9034@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 26 17:48:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHbt-0008ha-9v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHbr-0001xa-TX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHbm-0001xI-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHbl-0006oH-Ve for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHbl-0002Pg-Mx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9034 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 9034-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9034.16299928259202 (code B ref 9034); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 15:47:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHar-0002OM-BI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHap-0002No-E0 for 9034@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHaj-0006Ga-Qh; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2618 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJHaj-0000iV-E0; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:46:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877dg82u6n.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212723 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com, 9034@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:48:32 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This code is chock-full of questionable heuristics, and in particular > > tries to guess in which direction to move point out of the invisible > > text. The results are sometimes surprising. The upside is that it > > "mostly works". But if someone can come up with a better heuristics, > > I'm all ears. > > Ah, right. But... the super-confusing thing about this is that we're > not moving point in the buffer at all. The original recipe moved from point-min to an end of a line. > Just doing `M-: 4 RET' will result in this code adjusting point in > the buffer. Doing, for instance, `M-x foo RET' (where `foo' does > nothing) does not result in this point movement. > > So is `M-:' doing some weird thing in the original buffer to trigger > this oddity? Doing M-: in what part of the recipe?