From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49278: 28.0.50; Lisp Mode is for Common Lisp Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:42:34 +0300 Message-ID: <8335ptrw9x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2asa6lg.fsf@gmail.com> <87y27l4kym.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 49278@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 08:43:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1P7-0006F0-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:43:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1P6-0006lx-K7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1Op-0006fx-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1Op-0005Fn-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1Oo-0005cU-Gu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 06:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49278 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49278-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49278.163255216621572 (code B ref 49278); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 06:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2021 06:42:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1OY-0005bs-HJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1OV-0005bd-LL for 49278@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1OP-0004uc-6v; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4195 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU1OO-0002LY-6M; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:42:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:22:12 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215417 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:22:12 -0700 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 49278@debbugs.gnu.org > > João Távora writes: > > > No, we never decided on the wording, so only the change to the docstring > > was installed. > > OK, this is what I think we should install. Any objections? Yes, I don't think we should install this, for the reasons I explained in the previous discussion. Nothing's changed, so please consider this issue as closed.