From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50951: Fwd: bug#50951: 28.0.50; Urdu text is not displayed correctly Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 18:54:52 +0300 Message-ID: <8335pjbewj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mtnsc63i.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfxjbox7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmsnwlvo.fsf@igel.home> <837devbgrl.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12260"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50951@debbugs.gnu.org To: Rah Guzar Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 02 17:57:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhO8-0002xw-RB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 17:57:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhO7-0008LM-9I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhNm-0008L8-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhNl-0007lS-Td for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhNl-00077q-TK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50951.163319016427325 (code B ref 50951); Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 15:56:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60347 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhMq-00076f-ME for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55728) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhMp-00076A-3Q for 50951@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhMi-0006lr-FY; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3238 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWhLu-0000Bu-Ip; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 11:55:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Rah Guzar on Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:27:33 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216177 Archived-At: > From: Rah Guzar > Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:27:33 +0200 > > As I already added U+06C1 ARABIC LETTER HEH GOAL to the list of > required characters for displaying Arabic, the question is now: are > there fonts inappropriate for Arabic that support U+06C1, but do NOT > support U+06D2 ARABIC LETTER YEH BARREE? If there are such fonts, > then we should add U+06D2 to the list of required characters as well. > > I haven't seen a font like this and I will reach out if I do. But I think this solution > might cause issues with fonts for just Arabic which don't support Urdu (if there > are such). What kind of issues did you have in mind?