From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51556: 29.0.50; Poor contrast of Customize SVG icons with dark backgrounds Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 21:15:23 +0200 Message-ID: <8335oejrn8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v91b92v6.fsf@gmail.com> <83fssflmcg.fsf@gnu.org> <68034911-bc12-0c9e-cabb-c870628fd80c@gmail.com> <83a6imlo23.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuguk3h2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0hqjywm.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee7yjxb1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6imjv2o.fsf@gnu.org> <18066bc0-86a6-5901-9a53-e2c6ea13fbc8@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13337"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, 51556@debbugs.gnu.org, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 20:16:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzGV-0003Hc-FQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 20:16:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzGU-0000kn-Gn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzGN-0000kB-Mg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzGM-00072C-3A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzGL-0006t1-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51556.163588053826436 (code B ref 51556); Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2021 19:15:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzFy-0006sK-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56456) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzFw-0006s6-6r for 51556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzFq-0006wM-P9; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:15:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=JzbOwkh9IztuuhFCCEIVph1z3IUKhLeWQNqmVsZiXAA=; b=pyJMKeysfhNw 1uRKwjYEgV/+cgSAargqZtrOsJyTqOSuj9CVqTB7g6ngqR+L/8PLemOGzTNRnN14U81gXe5hk0ynz 5Nt0vy/WJDTm/6ZCMiYMHtpWWDZTGkTYjS/eapF0wRxfoHtWyytPFCKXm1OSax6MdBoSieGAwlzFv 2KzPZpn+hlymjEgaiUHLVjRQ7x0cAK+J53Iy+y6RUK5ec1HoSqZ8MF4u7oJ4zY7QS5fLEZJa0smF6 SuBnIHpIU2feOMQ5cKmvkukyJNmkdYETWcWc89KhZd7kL5SFF5LlIBQyz5FZME/2L1mIIf+CLPtZK QoQ1hsFu+Xj1eQ/TrKIrdQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1168 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzFn-0000Z6-ND; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:15:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:58:17 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218830 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:58:17 -0700 > Cc: 51556@debbugs.gnu.org, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com > > > If you're the author of a little-known package, you can't really > > expect theme authors to provide customized icons for your package that > > fit with the theme. However, themes *do* specify at least a handful of > > faces. As a package author, it would be convenient to be able to say > > "render this icon using the foreground color of the `error' face", for > > example. Then your package looks good with most themes without > > requiring anyone to provide custom SVGs. > > Exactly the point. This goes for built-in packages as well. How come built-in packages qualify as "little-known"? For really little-known packages, my suggestion would be to use icons whose visibility should be good with any theme. Or they could not use icons at all.