From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53497: 29.0.50; native-compile after restarting Emacs Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:28:36 +0200 Message-ID: <8335ldl3m3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86lez5zb7o.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgnl1l4o.fsf@gnus.org> <86h79tzait.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtjl1koq.fsf@gnus.org> <86czkhz9dk.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5107"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 53497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Arash Esbati Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 24 13:30:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nByUV-00017l-5i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:30:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nByUU-0001Hq-2L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:30:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nByTz-0001Ha-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nByTy-0003l0-T2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nByTy-00006M-PR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53497.1643027353302 (code B ref 53497); Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 12:29:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42447 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nByTA-0008WT-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBySu-0008VY-Fe for 53497@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:29:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=35258 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBySp-0003cn-4j; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:28:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wHp5Dcac+yzMuctT/xgUJG7JD4UVvcd+xG8pkLmE1rI=; b=FAg+QsuSuEkY vFBHuTCy5ZpAFwt/LWVlzaby8LJ04JNZ3G4uqjhqFZ6/gc2yDHYSA1YZjzsY/IAR2Rc9jymd9nTbl JvFgbde0EXYMMqGBHBXXgfSYHrkPBOVMUi7OYNu+sW3BaH0t4lGVhPJNV3h1SascSCuT8L9MzB7iQ XNf/u48ljwTtu6zy5xFVLTH1/EK93Y5b08x5hI+e1x0dUDm41VyHOGCqdv6TKqIq/Q0sX08jrpc8b UXzxDtrdouUr5K7cFOpvDYiuM3krl4RYGVjhD8L1Ni/QKhz5B9polwdm6SAxU/IyX4J3mag9CDeoR V6zHnQIYwq80B4M5/0u98w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4292 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBySo-0001Be-HW; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:28:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86czkhz9dk.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Arash Esbati on Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:00:23 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225033 Archived-At: > From: Arash Esbati > Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:00:23 +0100 > Cc: 53497@debbugs.gnu.org > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > So you delete `comp-native-version-dir' between 1) and 2)? > > No, that was step 0. I did: > > Case 1) > - Killed Emacs > - Deleted all files in `comp-native-version-dir' What exactly do you mean by comp-native-version-dir? it is not a full directory name, and there should be 2 such directories in any Emacs installation: one under lib/emacs/ and another under ~/.emacs.d/eln-cache/. Which one did you delete? More importantly, why do you delete that directory? what is the purpose of that, and what did you expect to happen as result? > - Started Emacs > - Waited for 77 .eln to be compiled under `comp-native-version-dir' > - Started Gnus > - Watched Gnus libraries getting compiled > > Case 2) > - Killed Emacs > - Deleted all files in `comp-native-version-dir' > - Started Emacs > - Waited for 77 .eln to be compiled under `comp-native-version-dir' > - Killed Emacs > - Started Emacs > - Started Gnus > - No compilation happens under `comp-native-version-dir' Which of these 2 scenarios sounds problematic to you, and why?