From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60886: 29.0.60; split-root-window-below broken for split-window-keep-point Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:16:56 +0200 Message-ID: <833584mhdz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86k01la7gn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r0vs0z44.fsf@gnu.org> <61dc9888-cb02-5323-f86f-23bdb19c5893@gmx.at> <865yd33dkf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <952857f0-ceca-9677-992b-9a1659130a0f@gmx.at> <83zgafyqvj.fsf@gnu.org> <0bc1444b-cb79-43e1-d363-5e40ad317fa0@gmx.at> <83pmbazvnn.fsf@gnu.org> <9703eeaf-42bf-aeb1-c03b-c3c8700aab48@gmx.at> <83a62epxo6.fsf@gnu.org> <3a9c38d8-ebf5-67d4-63de-a2d2acb127e6@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27129"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60886@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 09:18:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ94s-0006nr-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 09:18:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ94d-0006Os-FF; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ94c-0006Oj-Mk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ94c-0007ZP-EF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ94c-0002Wd-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 08:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60886 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 60886-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60886.16742890239633 (code B ref 60886); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 08:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60886) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2023 08:17:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47985 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ93f-0002VJ-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ93c-0002Ul-Jn for 60886@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:17:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ93W-0007Ut-5r; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:16:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=vFb/dXmINXKGZr0rCvMR9waVtkHaZF6EFW5VvfvcZAk=; b=R7J2xKRRtsH9 j/2AedxcaekEMi7eCRwbaqLS4yU5YpV/h+AggzQSR56iz6l5pScMOUFY69pKpHxvH5rvA+Y5ra5dc XZ30zAzFhB/xZZ1OQLwh/z9rp99xZbcB+ePGyCPNmbgeUXzOZH6yiB5bJawLS6i5h5cpUmycCyPzJ CCkmIRb7w5TDzdhUzBEOJkRngg/ujUyHzPm+rQ04lOgOFGeqfeVLxKJBqQyKM08Iu2Nez9sSAL1Gt dqjCuI629+lCb9vZnndmWfSTJkl9tknF0Pwz+FR+MWOeIGkpU4bBu2lIU3v2c2tOC2ikPNXrM3Shp ow180BuG31aQo+TTgJvVLQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJ93V-0005VH-FE; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 03:16:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3a9c38d8-ebf5-67d4-63de-a2d2acb127e6@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:17:39 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253837 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:17:39 +0100 > Cc: juri@linkov.net, 60886@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > > >> M-: (pop-to-buffer "*Messages*") > >> C-x w 3 > > > > This shows *Messages* in the new window, so I think something like > > > > ...the same buffer as the window which was selected when the > > function was invoked" > > > > should be good. > > This would miss the case where WINDOW-TO-SPLIT is live and not selected. > And also the case where the root window of a non-selected frame should > be split. OK, then how about ...the same buffer as shown in WINDOW-TO-SPLIT ? > >> The Elisp manual said about them > >> > >> For interactive use, Emacs provides two commands which always split > >> the selected window. > >> > >> which apparently is no longer true. > > > > That doesn't say "only for interactive use", and it would make no > > sense to say that for such a basic function, IMO. > > I meant the "always split the selected window" part. That is still correct in interactive use, isn't it?