From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7222: 24.0.50; image-checkbox-checked considered harmful Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:06:18 +0200 Message-ID: <831v7g8vqt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sk07b77s.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287868384 14563 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2010 21:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7222@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 23 23:13:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P9lOd-0000Hj-RI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:13:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9lOa-0002PA-PX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50349 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9lOU-0002OW-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9lOS-0003w6-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9lOS-0003w2-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P9lF0-0002XF-7R; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7222 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7222-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7222.12878677549738 (code B ref 7222); Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7222) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2010 21:02:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P9lEX-0002X1-IY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:02:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P9lEU-0002Ww-ND for 7222@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LAR00H00GW4T400@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 7222@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:06:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.63.198]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LAR00H6GHA7LG80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:06:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:03:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41102 Archived-At: > Cc: 7222@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:16:01 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > This is because the above two new defvar's call create-image, which > > signals an error if an unsupported image type is called out. > > Does simply sticking `ignore-errors' around those create-image calls work? "Works" as in "does not produce error messages", or "works" as in "produces .elc files that can then be run in a GUI session that supports images"?