From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8122: More regression notes for bug#8122 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:49:53 +0200 Message-ID: <831v2upzha.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110226143116.GB6286@srevilak.net> <20110226150524.GC6286@srevilak.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298737233 12940 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2011 16:20:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8122@debbugs.gnu.org To: Steve Revilak Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 17:20:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMse-0004yj-43 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:20:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53156 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtMsd-0004Cy-80 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48697 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtMfO-0006FL-P8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:06:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMfN-0003S7-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:06:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMfN-0003S2-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:06:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMPC-0006ub-T5; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:50:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8122 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8122-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8122.129873539926556 (code B ref 8122); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8122) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2011 15:49:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMP8-0006uH-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:49:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMP5-0006u3-RA for 8122@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:49:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LH800800E8YAT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 8122@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:49:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.53.157]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LH800629EN0LRN0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:49:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20110226150524.GC6286@srevilak.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:50:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44390 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:05:24 -0500 > From: Steve Revilak > Cc: > > I've tried to reproduce bug 8122 on pretest versions 23.2.92 and > 23.2.93. Here are my findings: > > Bug 8122 occurs in 23.2.94. > > Bug 8122 DOES NOT occur with 23.2.91, 23.2.92, or 23.2.93. > > So, this appears to be new behavior in 23.2.94. The culprit seems to be this change: 2011-02-12 Eli Zaretskii * terminal.c (create_terminal): Use default-keyboard-coding-system and default-terminal-coding-system to initialize coding systems of the new terminal. (Bug#7840) but I'd be damned if I understand how could it affect the character produced by the RET key. Hmm...