From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9402: list-colors-display Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:57:42 +0300 Message-ID: <831uw2g4tl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87obz83v0x.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <838vqcf086.fsf@gnu.org> <8739gjzzm1.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4E5C77CE.3000203@swipnet.se> <87hb4zp8mc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314727085 1416 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2011 17:58:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9402@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 30 19:58:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QySZS-0007GP-IG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:57:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QySZS-0001he-09 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:57:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QySZP-0001hO-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QySZN-00065i-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QySZN-00065e-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyScP-0000GB-JV; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:01:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9402 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9402-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9402.1314727254987 (code B ref 9402); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9402) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2011 18:00:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyScI-0000Fs-6o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:00:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyScG-0000Fk-09 for 9402@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LQR000005M9SD00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9402@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:57:42 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.83.44]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LQR000CJ5W5NF50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:57:42 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:01:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50447 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Juri Linkov , 9402@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:15:48 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Aha, and then you run this on an older GTK version where > > gtk_selection_bg_color isn't supported, then what? > > You cannot expect forward compatiblity in general. If you downgrade > then you have to cope with possibly missing features. I'm not looking for compatibility, I'm looking for a way to have such a face stand out in _some_ color. Otherwise, it will be displayed indistinguishable from the default face.