From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10304: 24.0.92: display bug Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:43:50 +0200 Message-ID: <831udzago9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762hihrj7.fsf@live.com> <8362gnhp9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8338yfamvk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357393503 24939 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2013 13:45:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 14:45:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU3m-0003aK-S0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:45:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48157 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU3X-0001CK-Cc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU3U-0001CF-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU3P-0007Jd-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:44:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU3P-0007Iw-4A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:44:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU3b-0004vr-4r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:45:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10304 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10304-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10304.135739347618937 (code B ref 10304); Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2013 13:44:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU35-0004vM-WD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:41846) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrU2v-0004vF-IT for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:44:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MG500700N0CL200@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:43:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MG500786NGYLA90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:43:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69411 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:38:07 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > According to this, the window had 70 lines, of which 43 displayed > > text; that text was comprised of empty lines, except for the 2nd line > > which displayed the text "Link "; and point was on that 2nd line. > > Does that sound reasonable? > > Yes, the only text in the buffer was the Link thing, and that was > probably on the second line. However, the window was (let's see) 43 > lines tall. OK, that's my misreading of the dump: the "(0)" part means the line is disabled in the glyph matrix, i.e. not displayed. > The image was (faultily) displayed right below the Link. So the bug seems to be that we don't clear those empty lines which occupied the screen estate of the image. Hmm... > > Btw, next time please use (dump-glyph-matrix 2), to get more > > information about the glyphs on display. > > Will do. Also, I just installed a few changes on the emacs-24 branch that make the matrix dump better, please resync if you can.