From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15797: 24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:46:09 +0200 Message-ID: <831u2t6yy6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871u2xf9st.fsf@gmail.com> <9jiow9uhoa.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wqkopylw.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo20fh3h.fsf@web.de> <834n7q95d5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqkltnmk.fsf@web.de> <8338n975tf.fsf@gnu.org> <87habpicv8.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383770832 4372 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2013 20:47:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15797@debbugs.gnu.org, kjambunathan@gmail.com To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 06 21:47:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VeA0Q-0002cz-N8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:47:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeA0Q-0003mh-DB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeA0J-0003mG-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeA0E-0007wB-47 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeA0E-0007w7-0Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VeA0D-0004ke-MS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15797 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 15797-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15797.138377080818245 (code B ref 15797); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15797) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2013 20:46:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9zz-0004kD-Td for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:62491) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9zv-0004jv-Ra for 15797@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVV0020005FWT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15797@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:46:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVV002J50D3OX90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:46:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87habpicv8.fsf@web.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80095 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 15797@debbugs.gnu.org, kjambunathan@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:50:03 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > From: Michael Heerdegen > > > Cc: Stefan Monnier , > > > 15797@debbugs.gnu.org, kjambunathan@gmail.com > > > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:02:11 +0100 > > > > > > BTW, when cache-long-scans t works now, is there any benefit in setting > > > it nil? > > > > We will shortly turn it on by default, as you see from the rest of > > this discussion. > > Sorry, you misunderstood. What I meant was: do we (perspectively) need > a variable at all, when a nil value only has downsides? You are rushing forward too fast, IMO. Just yesterday you said the feature was highly experimental. Let's have it on by default for a while, before we decide; meanwhile people will at least have a fire escape.