From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16433: Test case for newline cache corruption Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:44:58 +0300 Message-ID: <831tv8av2t.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401677186 24412 80.91.229.3 (2 Jun 2014 02:46:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Olum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 02 04:46:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIGQ-00086Z-0g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 04:46:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIGP-0008D1-9B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58259) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIGG-0008Bt-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIGB-000093-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIGB-00008z-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIGA-0005M9-Rg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 02:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16433 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16433-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16433.140167711920507 (code B ref 16433); Mon, 02 Jun 2014 02:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16433) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2014 02:45:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIFS-0005Kg-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42756) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrIFP-0005KH-Ae for 16433@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6I00J00SC7FT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16433@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:45:08 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6I00JOWSZ7ED40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:45:08 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89875 Archived-At: > From: Ken Olum > Cc: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:30:00 -0400 > > I couldn't apply the patch automatically, because I didn't have any > CLASH_DETECTION switch in my fileio.c, so patch couldn't find the > matching lines. I guess you tried to apply to the trunk, whereas I put the change in the emacs-24 branch (as it is clearly a regression wrt the previous release). > How did this get fixed in the emacs-24 branch but not propagated to > trunk? It got merged to the trunk a few hours ago, as part of revision 117220. The release branch is merged to the trunk from time to time.