From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18405: 24.3.93; bat-mode.el Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:40:00 +0300 Message-ID: <831trkc0xr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mwaf2pjx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r3zplxmz.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <540BCFFE.2090404@dancol.org> <83iokzcvdk.fsf@gnu.org> <540D008F.1080607@dancol.org> <83tx4ibzot.fsf@gnu.org> <540D18D8.8070901@dancol.org> <83ppf5aqrl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410273643 28648 80.91.229.3 (9 Sep 2014 14:40:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stromeko@nexgo.de, 18405@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 09 16:40:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMag-00056H-Tc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:40:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMag-0008AQ-Dw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:40:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMaW-0007wK-Lh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMaS-0001uS-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMaR-0001u3-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMaQ-00046T-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18405 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18405-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18405.141027360015762 (code B ref 18405); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18405) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2014 14:40:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMaN-000468-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:39:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59009) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRMaK-00045q-J6 for 18405@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NBN0000021YBC00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 18405@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:39:50 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NBN00MFM22DW770@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:39:50 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93193 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Daniel Colascione , Stromeko@nexgo.de, > 18405@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:45:50 -0400 > > > . variable definitions in for loops (the 'x' part in "for %%x") are > > highlighted with different face from their references in the "do" > > part of the loop > > FWIW in sh-mode, for something like "for f in echo $f", we also > highlight the two occurrences of "f" differently. I'm not saying it's > a feature, but it's definitely a common behavior to highlight the > "introduction" occurrence differently from the "reference" occurrences. Except that in the ntcmd case, that's not the intended behavior, AFAICT.