From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23574: 24.5; Overzealous underlining in emacs-nox Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:55:10 +0300 Message-ID: <831t4ataep.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83porxwg1f.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1nxudrb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpm3tyvn.fsf@gnu.org> <83twh7tt83.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3cbt5l3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9d6tl3j.fsf@gnu.org> <5755AACE.8030303@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465239387 22079 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2016 18:56:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23574@debbugs.gnu.org, john.b.mastro@gmail.com, cwoodbury@azavea.com, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 20:56:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zh7-0004tf-PO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 20:56:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zh6-0006y4-UC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zgz-0006wz-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zgv-0003Ip-TD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zgv-0003Il-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zgv-0007Bf-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 23574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23574.146523931427572 (code B ref 23574); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 18:55:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zg9-0007Ae-O6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zg8-0007AS-8F for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zfy-00032c-B0 for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zfm-0002zT-Qn; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4148 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zfi-0006ki-Us; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:54:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <5755AACE.8030303@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:54:38 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119174 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:54:38 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 23574@debbugs.gnu.org, john.b.mastro@gmail.com, cwoodbury@azavea.com > > > Going back to the bug report, there's still one issue to consider: > > should we add underline (and then also overline and strikethrough) to > > the list of face attributes that cause face extension on GUI frames. > > The logic behind the current code seems to be to extend attributes > > that are related to background of the text. The above 3 seem to be a > > kind-of background, so maybe we should add them. > > It would make my life much easier if face extension were, in general, > customizable. I would immediately turn it off everywhere. Can you suggest a defcustom for that (what type? which values mean what? etc)? Then we can talk how hard it is to implement that.