From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43725: 28.0.50; Include feature/native-comp into master Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 05:40:02 +0300 Message-ID: <831riiis8t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d02318fl.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32753"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 43725@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 04:41:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoWt-0008Od-L6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 04:41:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoWs-0001xR-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoWk-0001wh-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoWk-0001pw-Ln for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoWk-0003IN-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 02:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43725 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43725-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43725.160152001812573 (code B ref 43725); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 02:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43725) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2020 02:40:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoW1-0003Gj-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:40:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoW0-0003GI-5g for 43725@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoVs-0001Mp-H1; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1626 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kNoVr-0008Lj-Fk; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:40:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189458 Archived-At: > Cc: 43725@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:37:28 +0000 > From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > OTOH as the branch is already in emacs.git should be trivial for > reviewers at any point in time to produce the diff and quote the parts > they like to discuss. That's what I intended to do, FWIW. > Slightly different but related: I wanted to mention that I think would > be really good if possible to retain the current history. That is going > for a merge instead of applying a single patch. I believe this would be > of great help for me to maintain the code in the future. Fine by me.