From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44014: 28.0.50; Incorrect compilter warning that function is called with 2 arguments Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:52:46 +0300 Message-ID: <831rhzxwgx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87362fy5s3.fsf@gnus.org> <20201015133426.GB20257@protected.rcdrun.com> <87362fv471.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6332"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44014@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 15 18:53:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6V9-0001Zz-9i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:53:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33110 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6V8-0002Vc-95 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:53:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6Uy-0002RS-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6Uw-0001Tg-1I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6Uw-00032B-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44014 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44014-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44014.160278076111637 (code B ref 44014); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44014) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2020 16:52:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6Ua-00031d-Pi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6UY-00031P-Gs for 44014@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6UT-0001Qp-0C; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:52:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4884 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kT6US-0003SK-8e; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:52:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87362fv471.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:34:10 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190612 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:34:10 +0200 > Cc: 44014@debbugs.gnu.org > > Jean Louis writes: > > > Thanks. Compiler warning shows different line number, is that normal? > > Here's a minimal case to reproduce the bug: > > (defun bar (a) > a) > > (defun foo () > (bar 1) > (bar 1 2) > (bar 1)) > > It'll say that the error is on the final call to bar, not the preceding > line. If I remove the first call to bar, then it puts the error on the > correct line. > > Anybody know what could be causing this bug? The byte compiler doesn't really track source lines, only sexps. It's a known issue. There was a long discussion a year or so ago, and Alan Mackenzie proposed a concept of a solution, but it turned out to slow down compilation, so I don't think people were very enthusiastic.