From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42499: [PATCH] Add Bytecode Offset information to Backtrace Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:03:02 +0300 Message-ID: <831rhvshjt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tuxxzucm.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft6dusmq.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7qttcxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qskl6y.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36556"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 18 17:04:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAEE-0009OP-7s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:04:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47130 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAED-0007zW-B7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAE7-0007zB-GR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAE6-0005xP-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAE6-0006PZ-Lo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42499 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 42499-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42499.160303339524591 (code B ref 42499); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2020 15:03:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUADK-0006OY-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUADA-0006Nq-Fg for 42499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAD5-0005sU-6o; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1851 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUAD4-0001Qn-C2; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:02:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7qskl6y.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:11:33 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190888 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: zshaftel@gmail.com, 42499@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:11:33 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I don't think we should start dismissing .elc compiled files just > > because native compilation is on the horizon. Some users might > > legitimately decide they don't want their Lisp natively-compiled, or > > may be unable to do so because of the GCC version they have > > installed. We should continue supporting byte-compilation features > > for the next few versions at least. > > Yes, of course. The only question is whether it makes sense to add new, > advanced features that is only relevant for .elc files at this point I think it does, for those very reasons. We cannot deprecate .elc files, certainly not yet.