From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 18:36:19 +0200 Message-ID: <831rcoqo70.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86wnutogrh.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnut8fb9.fsf@gmail.com> <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x6u9o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzesrku.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupms4mp.fsf@gnu.org> <838s6wqxyg.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5242"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, pipcet@gmail.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 09 19:48:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJhPE-0001F5-Vq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:48:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJhPD-0002bu-Vd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:48:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfM0-0004e9-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfM0-0004vI-31 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfLy-0003KI-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161530779112750 (code B ref 46256); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2021 16:36:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfLT-0003JZ-2c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:36:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfLR-0003JN-LH for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:36:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfLM-0004kn-1n; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4994 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJfLJ-0005pc-S8; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:36:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:58:31 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201920 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:58:31 +0000 > > > I think it _is_ the case, but the problem might be that the refcount > > is not zero, and therefore the shared library is not actually unloaded > > and unmapped. (I say "might be" because I still don't see the > > scenario where this could happen, and I'm not sure if it does happen > > the solution should be as suggested -- it could be that it's better to > > not load the .eln the second time, i.e. make 'load' behave like > > 'require'). > > That was my understanding (as I don't see why dlclose should fail) but > reading the man page: > > "On success, dlclose() returns 0; on error, it returns a nonzero value." > > So my understanding now is that it can fail. Am I wrong? I don't know. Posix says no errors are defined for dlclose, so maybe look at the glibc sources to see what happens on GNU/Linux?