From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:14:59 +0200 Message-ID: <831rckl56k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8lrmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1wl6ao.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32491"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 17:20:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkWP-0008KC-2F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:20:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkWO-0001LA-0S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkSI-00069t-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkSH-0001J9-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:16:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkSH-0007uE-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.161556570730325 (code B ref 47067); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 16:15:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkRP-0007t3-DD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:15:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40502) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkRN-0007sG-Oe for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkRG-0000b3-JU; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1063 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkRF-0000cG-77; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:14:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:08:33 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202173 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 47067@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:08:33 +0000 > > > In my case the top of the stack looks like this: > > > > #0 0x01236788 in arithcompare_driver (nargs=2, args=0x28, > > comparison=ARITH_LESS) at data.c:2673 > > #1 0x01236860 in Flss (nargs=2, args=0x28) at data.c:2691 > > #2 0x0a872285 in ?? () > > #3 0x01261898 in funcall_lambda (fun=XIL(0xa00000000a0bf230), nargs=5, > > arg_vector=0x826a08) at eval.c:3292 > > #4 0x012601ed in Ffuncall (nargs=6, args=0x826a00) at eval.c:3013 > > #5 0x0a8e0dbf in ?? () > > #6 0x012601ed in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0x826bd8) at eval.c:3013 > > #7 0x0a8ce041 in ?? () > > #8 0x01261898 in funcall_lambda (fun=XIL(0xa0000000069f2a50), nargs=1, > > arg_vector=0x826db8) at eval.c:3292 Btw, what are those "??" there instead of function names? Do you see the same on your system?