From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46926: Remove the quotes from highlighted/linked symbols when displaying docs Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:51:42 +0200 Message-ID: <831rcgfgpd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83czw3jy72.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1vjvm4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft0zhuyi.fsf@gnu.org> <838s6rhthh.fsf@gnu.org> <6214567e-7e89-010d-5d0a-de0b69392625@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="854"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: laszlomail@protonmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, rms@gnu.org, 46926@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 15 18:54:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrQB-00005O-Ls for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:54:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrQA-000120-KE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:54:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNq-0006vk-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNp-00044U-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNp-0004Fc-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46926.161583070916321 (code B ref 46926); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2021 17:51:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNd-0004FB-1x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:51:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNb-0004Ex-7h for 46926@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNV-0003vG-3K; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4044 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLrNM-0002of-Bf; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:51:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6214567e-7e89-010d-5d0a-de0b69392625@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:28:34 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202422 Archived-At: > Cc: 46926@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, rms@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:28:34 +0200 > > On 13.03.2021 19:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Until the project has such an expert consultant, wouldn't asking the > >> emacs community be a better way to decide such issues? E.g. running > >> a vote on /r/emacs. > > No, because offering an opt-in behavior is a better way of letting > > users to try the feature. > > Perhaps these two actions can be combined? How would you propose to combine them? > We have had a UI professional chime in here now, BTW. Good news.