From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48117: 28.0.50; Update of loaddefs.el during normal build is unreliable Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 16:00:53 +0300 Message-ID: <831raqa9ru.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335v8c7o0.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf8zbyr8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6pfbw3s.fsf@gnu.org> <83tunna9dt.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1ira8rs.fsf@gnu.org> <4edb1435266f8ca80b73@heytings.org> <83fsz6amij.fsf@gnu.org> <4edb143526eb913b641f@heytings.org> <837dkiajbd.fsf@gnu.org> <4edb143526f99ac92176@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8004"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 48117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 15:02:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpG9-00020O-G1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 15:02:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47202 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpG8-00088P-7g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpFy-000886-9j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpFy-0006HD-2y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpFx-0005JH-VD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 13:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48117.161987407320395 (code B ref 48117); Sat, 01 May 2021 13:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 13:01:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36360 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpFA-0005It-UP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpF8-0005In-Uf for 48117@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpF3-0005gU-2T; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3024 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lcpEz-0007ux-KO; Sat, 01 May 2021 09:01:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4edb143526f99ac92176@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Sat, 01 May 2021 12:29:12 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205344 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 12:29:12 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: rgm@gnu.org, 48117@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Compromise between which alternatives? > > > > I see at least the following possible alternatives: My point is that the gain from your proposal wrt the next best alternative is small, but the price is too high.