From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49037: flyspell word correction frustrating Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:33:50 +0300 Message-ID: <831r933udd.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25989"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49037@debbugs.gnu.org To: henri-biard@francemel.fr Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 15 19:34:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCx2-0006V7-PD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:34:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCx1-00029G-Fd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwu-00024Y-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwr-0007a0-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwr-0004TY-Sq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49037 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 49037-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49037.162377843617192 (code B ref 49037); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49037) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2021 17:33:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwm-0004TE-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47036) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwl-0004T3-Hx for 49037@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwf-0007T2-MX; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3424 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltCwf-0003Aa-BA; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:33:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (henri-biard@francemel.fr) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208581 Archived-At: > From: henri-biard@francemel.fr > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, > 49037@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:08:48 +0200 (CEST) > > >> If it was good information I would not complain. > > >What is not good about it? > > For instance: > > 1. It does not tell me that aspell is the default Why should it? You set up your system with whatever spell-checker you want, and Emacs uses that. It is not Emacs's business to tell you which spell-checker to install and use. > 2. It does not tell me that even when I use ispell-word, it might actually > do something else (aspell-word maybe). ispell-word is a command, it is unrelated to the program being invoked. The manual clearly says that those commands can work with any one of the 4 supported spell-checkers. > 3. It does not describe that it searches PATH. That's an implementation detail. If you want to know those details, you have the source to read and study. The user manual explains how to use the commands, not how the commands work.