From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50179: [PATCH] Add support for "bright" ANSI colors to ansi-color and term-mode Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:54:08 +0300 Message-ID: <831r6hv51r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838s0rvyfu.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgt6vi43.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6l5k9xr.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf4p3210.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27043"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, 50179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 18:55:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwBC-0006pA-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:55:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50196 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwBB-0003Gi-AW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwB4-0003GB-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwB4-00061C-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwB4-0000zk-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50179.16299104573769 (code B ref 50179); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 16:54:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwAL-0000yi-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:54:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwAJ-0000yV-Lb for 50179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:54:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwAE-0005S5-9u; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1945 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIwAD-0005e8-PG; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:54:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lf4p3210.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:46:51 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212661 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 50179@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:46:51 +0200 > > > I contacted assign@ to get it updated, and I don't foresee any > > problems, but you never know with companies. If the maintainers are ok > > with the patch being in-tree despite this, then I'm ok with it too; I > > just wanted to be sure everyone was aware of the situation. > > Hm... perhaps the best thing to do would be to revert the two patches > while waiting for the paperwork to be finalised. On the other hand, > that's more churn in the VC. Uhm... I'm not sure whether we have a > policy here. Eli? I think we have to revert and wait for the paperwork to run to completion.