From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48201: bug(s) in underline-region Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 20:31:37 +0300 Message-ID: <831r5k4gli.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210503172753.eh5ben552ebohxo4@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83wnsf66vo.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgxbxxea.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="806"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 48201@debbugs.gnu.org, boruch_baum@gmx.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 19:33:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0h4-000AbR-LP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:33:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0h2-0008Qe-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0gY-0008FI-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0gY-00009l-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0gX-0002Ig-TK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48201 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48201-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48201.16320727238761 (code B ref 48201); Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48201) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2021 17:32:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0fX-0002Gt-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0fV-0002Gf-Ex for 48201@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0fP-0007ey-Ka; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:31:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3542 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mS0fK-0008I3-HT; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:31:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 19 Sep 2021 10:07:32 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214770 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 10:07:32 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 48201@debbugs.gnu.org, Boruch Baum > > >> AFAIU, this package does that 100% intentionally. > > > > I believe so too: it's a kind of backspace overstriking referred to by > > termcap/nroff/ul. A variation is often seen in the output of fortune. > > > > See e.g.: > > - https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnterminalString > > - https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/274658/230197 > > Should this therefore be closed as notabug? IMO, yes.