From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15809: [External] : Re: bug#15809: 24.3.50; wrong defcustom type for `suggest-key-bindings' Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 19:01:16 +0300 Message-ID: <831r5cr6er.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87txca8ede.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87zh46wzj7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, larsi@gnus.org, 15809@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 18:04:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUAAU-0001TF-Ra for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 18:04:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53588 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUAAS-0000o7-Fp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA7m-0006J5-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA7l-0004Gv-R2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA7l-0000bm-N1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 16:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15809 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 15809-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15809.16325856882296 (code B ref 15809); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 16:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15809) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2021 16:01:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA7E-0000ay-F9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:01:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47414) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA7C-0000ak-UI for 15809@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:01:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA77-0003pC-5W; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3542 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUA76-0001d4-5I; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:01:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:22:00 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215464 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:22:00 +0000 > Cc: "15809@debbugs.gnu.org" <15809@debbugs.gnu.org> > > There's a real, big difference between "must" and > "should". And in general "should" is a weasel word > and "should" ;-) be avoided in technical doc. True for documents that specify formal requirements. Which our documentation isn't. So this is an unnecessary complication, and we shouldn't be bothered by it.