From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 20:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: <831r17y0zn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tugkkfid.fsf@gnus.org> <83fss44rbn.fsf@gnu.org> <875yt0ipre.fsf@gnus.org> <834k8k3za3.fsf@gnu.org> <874k8jfloo.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgqb18hq.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqb6tcm.fsf@gnus.org> <87tue3y96e.fsf@gnus.org> <83fspny8fp.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmory859.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee57y7xz.fsf@gnu.org> <87lezfy70y.fsf@gnus.org> <83czkry6jw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7a3y5no.fsf@gnus.org> <838rvfy2dr.fsf@gnu.org> <834k63y1xb.fsf@gnu.org> <87fspnlebu.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20446"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 16 19:45:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AX4-00058s-Ev for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 19:45:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AX2-0008Ha-BF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:45:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AWV-0008Gm-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AWU-00045D-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AWU-0003KR-M8; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.164235868212752 (code B ref 51733); Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2022 18:44:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AW9-0003Jb-Ji for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43238) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AW1-0003JI-Ro for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:44:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=52104 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AVv-00040f-RY; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:44:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=3IiIZtrknU/OINUqzFFKYLK2BGREpfhpPFHtzgRgz0Q=; b=rbAaFvPGahbl Oej/btP97vCkNNx3sstJ5zoto56R/psmoecA6JmKNawGfGjy14ITVmSqTzkkGh6sKgPITBqLUYfWu mceHO6t4/uyAZQAzwn8/eTLGw4OxERor9GFkiXMAmGC+nq3obXia/H4s/9UuzP7cY/wR4ZMq+FRuU 4jXz9aLVvj3I/rD+Wa1i5cl26M+e596X0El/aJKFxcLvMgROhMd0myUv1un/vprZTPt2Oi55J4JCt sVK+C6/hlxGZwyLprKrorPqXOh/Ywnj7wklAuJY7Tf1SCNK3gvwxcqm8mIBUZu6fYToTVwQFDziYk CGJ5xmcxa3KDCAnfsqgtRQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3870 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9AVw-0005ca-30; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:44:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fspnlebu.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 16 Jan 2022 19:34:29 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224414 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 19:34:29 +0100 > > On Jan 16 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 20:14:08 +0200 > >> From: Eli Zaretskii > >> Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > >> > >> > (elt char-script-table #xAB65) > >> > => latin > >> > > >> > which is wrong, because that's > >> > > >> > GREEK LETTER SMALL CAPITAL OMEGA > > > > Btw, this is not necessarily an error, because the Latin language did > > have the omega letter. It's not an accident this character is in a > > Latin block. > > The latin omega has its own code points U+A7B6 and U+A7B7 (since Unicode > 8.0). Yes, I know. But U+AB65 predates Unicode 8.0. And it's besides the point, really: since omega was in the Latin alphabet, it is not a mistake to give it the Latin script.