From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17444: closed (Re: bug#17444: 24.3; cannot C-u M-x recompile (interactively) from outside *compilation* buffer.) Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:11:40 -0400 Message-ID: <8261lfj5j7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399651936 16836 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2014 16:12:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17444@debbugs.gnu.org To: "B. L." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 09 18:12:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WinP5-00030o-J9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 18:12:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WinP5-0006Dr-3m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WinP0-0006BO-U6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WinP0-0004bh-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WinP0-0004bd-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WinOz-0004yI-LQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 16:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17444 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17444-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17444.139965190519087 (code B ref 17444); Fri, 09 May 2014 16:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17444) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2014 16:11:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WinOj-0004xm-8H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:11:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33203 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WinOg-0004xd-QP for 17444@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:11:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WinOf-0002fn-9t; Fri, 09 May 2014 12:11:41 -0400 X-Spook: diwn offensive information warfare covert video Pine Gap X-Ran: #;LP7b:\iRSDYe=yI\YG|~|8NOq.'"^c1}L[Oa85egX#i#!Q&zt{3pX1jtn"{#h.$A`>{? X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (B. L.'s message of "Fri, 9 May 2014 09:55:08 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88830 Archived-At: "B. L." wrote: > use of recompile, but I have a quick follow-up question. I have noticed > that if I compile interactively (through C-u M-x compile), I receive an > interactive *compilation* buffer that is in comint mode. If I perform M-x > recompile in the original source buffer, where I performed the compile, the > code is recompiled but the *compilation* buffer is no longer in comint > mode. I can't reproduce that. My compilation buffers are always in compilation-mode.