From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22679: 25.0.91; ibuffer-do-shell-command-pipe truncate output Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:28:59 -0400 Message-ID: <7oa66k9es.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468085420 31824 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2016 17:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 17:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22679@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 19:30:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw4w-0007Ni-PN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 19:30:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw4v-0007ED-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw4q-0007E3-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw4p-0006Lc-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw4o-0006LM-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw4o-0003bz-Od for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 17:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22679 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22679-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22679.146808535713793 (code B ref 22679); Sat, 09 Jul 2016 17:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22679) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2016 17:29:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw45-0003aN-CE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw43-0003Ze-Do for 22679@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw3x-0006Ik-DM for 22679@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw3v-0006Hf-Vj; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bLw3q-00069e-Hx; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:29:02 -0400 X-Spook: Peking Chemical weapon blackjack Security Council X-Ran: M&]{e=UFS7/[teiK[-3fWiRNJ{Al/!q3H*O'&E#<=orUf8b%5i=]`f(Wa},S?M?4l4ipXd X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:27:27 +0900 (JST)") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120710 Archived-At: Tino Calancha wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> Yes, I don't know if it is worth adding such an argument. >> I was really just complaining about how the function works. :) > I like your proposal: it simplifies the code and it reads much better. > But i am quite new here as to modify that stuff in simple.el: > some people may not understand why to change `shell-command' just > to fix one marginal command that just few people use. You could ask on emacs-devel (though that is often unproductive). Frankly my own preference would be to change the function so that it does not erase the output buffer, and change the callers instead; but that may be totally unfeasible. > Of course the priority is to make the command works as it should. > If i need to fix this i think i would find less resistance if my patch > just modify the offending command, possibly with an ugly code. You should feel free to just change ibuffer if that is what you prefer. It will certainly be less hassle for you.