From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44180: 28.0.50; Emacs frames won't redisplay unless resized Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:55:48 +0200 Message-ID: <7f32498b-1293-f1ee-5636-8ddd5bbff6c1@gmx.at> References: <87wnzgkdsj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83k0vgiyub.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0vgkbgq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83eeloivgc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lffw1wjv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10143"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44180@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 08:57:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDUV-0002YK-CX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:57:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDUU-0007UA-7Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDU6-0007Ti-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDU6-0003eY-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDU6-000681-4V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 06:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44180.160352257023491 (code B ref 44180); Sat, 24 Oct 2020 06:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2020 06:56:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58920 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDTG-00066o-Hs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:44171) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWDTB-00066C-2N for 44180@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:56:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603522549; bh=eCjc/c3ZEG5/B4IqKZff7UOW2yfYEqdOuDbgnSB9bG8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GVsiaj6rkILNatuHUj/g94EP0bSiEs9nGuP9y0raTpWal9BqGbOq3FDKuvzoJzpjf MGhARwPSSGrFtn8CyP36RT584kzA66oxrtqkZ7SQqGi20Lw3chvJpbfItDrS/SQ2n4 ztMVOiWgHHVqc+Y5VOTkQz5w3yRFjJh0FwBT5ACc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.220]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mt79F-1kGKFA1dXt-00tPxu; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:55:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lffw1wjv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fD+tllwEtP6mykuqWSZoO8MuJsxVShI6kTipyaEnBNdnGvtz2mG HIcSMXKxcmqxRBx0PmaTGU4VxqdzhMzKwd319HXU+Ub8rxJDQY+eSx/bjURD3iGJ+sWD/9h zfVGKavS1xstOW5lp8FxziFJ+CsoH7wy3+MfQwp218iLEjMyy3BD1Yshw/0Hmx5dlCd1MxT G9uPLAjJTVh98mLrHJemg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:11Uhhi08fw8=:eTYvX2GjOu7ZJRgh/K0cVz ZaKZeTDB/5cpxxKyTbsFqv50c/lYBRuCWcMCvBiBVK0mxuoE5A3pBnyLB0Eyw2zXVM8VH5hIN Gglki9/AigbYPCNwgQnPq45nh1ymWMDIFmyZQRqr5Ujvc96KoJ+eG4lYbOAQLg+xtHITBfOj0 8KbXKB/DD5w8mQCS5tmBPtU7KuYNpKDU1+t8w15PB9Ya8jibagw1Q7fh9Di1Bkuy+qXVuTylN ZxAkx6djZ3XfuUyvbJUJyRDKrvm80k/3kSLJ+sv+2GslHjgY92guVysy+Bp/VaofTvJbPACDX UVg91y0Rcc26Ge6o4pxdJ18CtJmkuKaD9KijxqLPW6dsLKVhFw6zC24tTV5pkNMiYe/fT0Kre 96Q6lpexv6v7XEzUjPf+0ji0ADPoPNlcupj1Pigl2GMngiida4oDdmEtKCWnbyn2sU1LhlfSu ujsmKCD4t96e5pvE2oPqqTm2o3a/OfjP0GBwUzOYLDCcMtgKO6mj1JdisxYVDlbAQnhUJ3axG V1Bh9Nhu4S7e3XgSWED3eQ720isSGEMRRwAm4obi+VA6gbHg6kSCGMfNx3yX03itKtu80rGTY TvbGLJzHAUqVUFAFWwpdjHyUzQLFhZxdO92wAh4Qkr52ukjrlBEkdNUKsuiamhJbU68dxrapY z0Y0kl12p34FYlO8PREU/OBY5Ghsgdr1+1VW9wykJmLabVn4xXsP3byFnnVa7GYTFGQuVI73r keKLVSUIsPAHgIdXrVVksWnEFlNno8c1g51r5XMLQ+pVCYVb6fxmSpQHFnAe9h5hph+2/xfM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191408 Archived-At: I just meant that their 'visibility frame-parameter became 'icon. Their > "real" visibility is the same as always -- the two non-focused frames > are visible only as stacked title bars above the currently focused frame. Can you please describe this in more detail. As I understand it, your initial frame looks as usual until you do C-x 5 2. At that moment, the initial frame becomes non-focused and appears as a stacked title bar while the new frame becomes focused and appears as expected. Is that right? Then how does the "fullscreen frames by default" fit into this picture and how does a tiling manager use stacking? >>> I haven't changed anything in my window manager config, and the i3 >>> package hasn't been updated since August. The only recent commit that >>> looks like it could be at all relevant is 2c0cd90083. >> >> And if you revert that change, does the problem go away? > > Yes it does! Maybe we need an option for 2c0cd90083. Maybe we also should just wait. I'd expect a few more of such reports to drop in. martin