From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56025: 29.0.50; em-extpipe-test-2 times out on EMBA and Cygwin Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:50:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7e7daa2f-dbbc-cd0a-4958-2a2932b17837@gmail.com> References: <8e21db9c-0100-998e-f280-81304e7ff61a@cornell.edu> <87mtecl82o.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> <40d9e52f-2041-b341-ff77-546ca7792791@cornell.edu> <87k09elrf8.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> <1de33903-4c55-e043-3754-726f7044f2d0@cornell.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35855"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Ken Brown , Sean Whitton , 56025@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 18 05:51:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PUM-0009Bq-60 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 05:51:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33856 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PUK-0005xC-Gx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PUE-0005x1-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PUD-0004MR-PX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PUD-0004Wx-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 03:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56025 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56025-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56025.165552425017399 (code B ref 56025); Sat, 18 Jun 2022 03:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56025) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 03:50:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PU2-0004WZ-9P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:34078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2PTz-0004WL-4y for 56025@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id mh16-20020a17090b4ad000b001e8313301f1so8280031pjb.1 for <56025@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:50:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JgtQ0hwQi34G4oTOucX0wJyOkslDHiIN1CzbWmCFTy8=; b=gdt0ottVITxRn+PdD5tS6RBljKT41vIKhwSg+9Cgv+ewW0HSdV+OsWTcniwuj3j9Wg NX5LOJlPR1B+4eUPEN8N9/dqRqBDPlfFgV8o/Y6mUt2TLnXz3VY35s+6g3SmbZF6sd/D gtJL9EhKyR4TmDwaUx9kGthSUuwJc6T3SVdniJpOgLFG6Otjt01CmffU03m742Ptq5if LGNF0mxdkfOX/DhQxBqDSzu5gIrFhMbIeJjVkz6GSK/NigskCDWq81QyHPT1hWxwHNfH CWZhJ7Ccx3Ni4TO33oQ32CnQ+HjPnJbUyIbav6ElWLTn4Ff+yr4a7AQIWBR3NOuNaqU7 oI5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JgtQ0hwQi34G4oTOucX0wJyOkslDHiIN1CzbWmCFTy8=; b=etUVTqy6h2QjfGq8Lbk2EUeNVE9Zd65jLB1CeghPv77cuzwzZnK5TGXCmcii/ucpAP MOZHasqdp1ueTRgjb14D6Xz+DmLEeqZGp6YFYIBJ0CPJoibwR6ummU4RnkRiurH36Nmn 5/aj2jMP0nMvBc8zPScoiElg4tfyWmG11j/DlBXn6T+fQ5aBWx3Y9GvpAcyjlW32HZA9 UAio1ZLirJ8HcU5KxqbIvq5YlgQcrGqHe7k32L2PR5IVzisdTe7kdjPFaAVfqbTalwut W5Er8lU6Ue8eC3VVmyvUKCAZy7gt8GN9u3U43tWnT9ZpXkuVFxa1XA+dOQhkCi2u1lrz in+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9r9dh0/VIqZ0ltMVW+tN7XYC+xDz4qO2UZosCpzONUOE9fq9I5 o1jnlkatS/qOxleg2FLF3Zg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sfiqMlAmmbrshGep+yXZbkRM+yfvj5pdFpx33LFtjy9BjlEyGwsm2HEWskyzjmFYNAh8fNhg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d90:b0:1e3:3025:66fe with SMTP id oj16-20020a17090b4d9000b001e3302566femr24917172pjb.145.1655524241048; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 9-20020a17090a0cc900b001e3937f21absm3175181pjt.19.2022.06.17.20.50.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:50:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1de33903-4c55-e043-3754-726f7044f2d0@cornell.edu> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:234735 Archived-At: On 6/17/2022 7:07 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 6/17/2022 8:57 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> Could you see if the same thing happens if you type >> >>      echo "bar" | sh -c "rev >temp" >> >> into an interactive session, please? >> >> If it's the same then extpipe has uncovered a general Eshell bug. > > Yes, it's the same.  And it's even the same if I remove the quotation > marks around "rev >temp". Does the above command also fail on Emacs 28? I changed some aspects of process management for Eshell in Emacs 29, so it's possible this is a regression. If it works correctly under Emacs 28, I'd be very interested to see the results of bisecting to find the breaking commit.