From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47207: 28.0.50; decode_next_window_args crash Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:15:13 +0000 Message-ID: <7dee3f4235d5c29fd3fc@heytings.org> References: <83h7l9d651.fsf@gnu.org> <83eegdd4uz.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wsdcob.fsf@gnu.org> <11b795a6-1a20-cc58-73d6-b75227dc732a@gmx.at> <83r1kcflv6.fsf@gnu.org> <872ab30c-3492-b523-eb4a-2f33a6c5da56@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15688"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47207@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 16 02:16:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC9a-0003zm-Dq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:16:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34886 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC9Z-00048K-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC9S-000489-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC9S-0006fh-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC9S-0006lz-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47207.161853211725980 (code B ref 47207); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2021 00:15:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC8i-0006kx-Ml for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:15:16 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:39868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXC8h-0006kp-AA for 47207@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:15:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1618532113; bh=SLs92xzHJplbVh6RB81r1mdZivpUA2R8tQvqIxQBO9s=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=HrN1EZ52+C9NWogmTG6rJquMzoAU6B+gj1AKYpsHrfbA5tOSs/dOAyL5Wsr+3CMpw a7NJJx3EF242gZ+cjRTgV2s6Joo5/LFtMka8+yjec0MAFoUwoU+ay32lOlDUERHXwW NFi2AV7DmSuidYFVS6Xzds6UxJE5PDUNequJDb/jBsX1ZtyhyFXYx3aN3lxoQNQVtj D6iVvUm8lyeo0EWzSqQYoHGUJ8kiYmc7HZZGLTvYiTM7jXiI5woUAnByBDNAc31o// dTBiZ78d2ZBf8pkMlOTJfP5E/GWsyVTb3VMv/K6tAHcEppJ4BwDowtLJeC6cxaUAGa HRIbqMTKUwBXw== In-Reply-To: <872ab30c-3492-b523-eb4a-2f33a6c5da56@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204105 Archived-At: >> So, where do we go from here? I'm quite willing to make these changes >> to minibuf.c. Would that be OK with everybody else? > > It would be OK with me (and should fix Bug#47774 too). And please look > into Bug#47781 next. > Not with me, FWIW. The minibuffer was perfectly functional before commit 2ecbf4cfae. Backward incompatible changes and bugs were introduced since then. The current state of affairs is rather sad; as you said, it's the first time in several years that you've been losing Emacs sessions. That's quite a high price for a small feature that nobody requested.