From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 18:35:28 +0300 Message-ID: <7d450c54-d4f5-b871-91e5-b00019ff323a@yandex.ru> References: <48066d7c-e4d3-acf5-fdcf-1aa9a108cb90@yandex.ru> <1554100819364-0.post@n8.nabble.com> <1554216459522-0.post@n8.nabble.com> <83mul8fn8d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="196620"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/67.0 Cc: 23179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , pklammer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 17:36:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLSj-000p3F-1G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:36:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36579 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLSi-0000yW-18 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLSF-0000gR-5P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLSE-0007bi-9P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLSE-0007af-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLSD-0003oy-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 23179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23179.155421934214659 (code B ref 23179); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2019 15:35:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLRt-0003oN-Tr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:43917) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLRr-0003o9-1N for 23179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id k17so17214333wrx.10 for <23179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 08:35:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pao/SXWrC9V3b+xorzFW3KXaRLzj64ozaWhQyt0p5fU=; b=Nd6EIoq/zrUccQ5MwEwuZuabj7trFAbS7kyHyAissAsbPeCWtKN1oZ45dlEy7otMfi 1fEj2YlbCtzVYGF7S4+K5aaQwT4CYSG0r/cihGSKDhsSXNP1g3+Uu/++1//LieVW74hD 5rTd5YTEbwkXfgh6r1qd2bqxTQzQnCuJjRzHF+1Ko7mTRIGDAsDNWh2JT+EB6mIOs9Gt 6CucrAB7j62MukjLkFXsXupp2VZR5St8BciPL9YxNGKnqrq2UyJyQVa4QtTJoDzDccBC lofBYcgWOeZIwzPIwm4fuY2mDCG8M5782Qk3G1AMFjuAANYHfdPW2tajOhj8vRmPjEDK 7WcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pao/SXWrC9V3b+xorzFW3KXaRLzj64ozaWhQyt0p5fU=; b=lWQCFHNIPo9KUi8Al1ju2N++TDr9C9lL7hXYaLIdQ/YY5oShiX6D8nLoY24HVhqy5N Pfxp3NexIxdX8NAYvbGUwl1IfeA5Uh5izlGeekoqmdayw1Bm6tS+B83i1wzZY5KGFU+m hUVOlS/o7j/Xa6Cytf0D4BFwCWp6NwjJvNEQH4BhWCZl7XFyYEy6QZGeiy55rYYmVI6a uTfBI0N0Y/aVru7hvbUoAlDGzvcI8+Bujskc5vjdylCO0oXXgb30hW/8iHUBPlzYvKqf olVo5L5R+ia1Ru0Mx3bPpaXkHIyQFZZB3r6GS9SNcEkJKPxFog9VG4J4UYnFAjBd6atc it4w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXd+K/HaW1wQbIsRUqGkCYhNYhVEst66/ESQDJH1gJ7mqVqRzTV r8TNjeSPqC158KrEUglgvqT7byUE X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCyu9G23YPgNXIxQJ9Qzq6o4Lwzw7AWiqYzOy6GyjiBerj7+P2YS4C4xk6jVPALOv1J7xjQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:428f:: with SMTP id k15mr49065734wrq.113.1554219332729; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 08:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z14sm16248097wrv.78.2019.04.02.08.35.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mul8fn8d.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157097 Archived-At: On 02.04.2019 18:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > We should welcome patches to provide implementation of tags-search > based on Xref machinery. Would you or someone else like to work on > that? Y'all can try 'M-x project-find-regexp' or 'M-x project-search' in the meantime, depending on the personal preference for the UI. >> I found the attitude (3 years ago today) about this breakage very dismissive >> and inconsiderate. > > There was a long discussion about that (in addition to the one in this > bug report). > >> I would have appreciated it if there were some better breadcrumbs to follow >> to restore familiar operation. > > The change was called out in Emacs 25.1's NEWS (as all user-visible > changes are). Indeed. So I don't think expecting a user who upgrades to a new major version (and even skipped over one) to have to adapt to one or two new key bindings is all that inconsiderate.