From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10539: 24.0.92; low display-time-interval makes Emacs slow Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:07:24 -0500 Message-ID: <7cvcnv2g9v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87zkdl93r0.fsf@web.de> <6162fwu92z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y5ssxlrx.fsf@gnu.org> <838vkry3ju.fsf@gnu.org> <837h0by0qu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327817288 15355 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2012 06:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 07:08:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvo-00009y-Vp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:08:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvo-0003xD-3f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvl-0003wx-1O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvk-00017R-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:08:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvk-00017N-0m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:08:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvl-0007Bj-TC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10539.132781725227594 (code B ref 10539); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 06:07:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvH-0007B0-Qe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55408 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvF-0007At-2L for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrNvA-0004M0-Qy; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:07:24 -0500 X-Spook: AIMSX Al Jazeera North Korea Elvis SSL Rumsfeld jihad AVN X-Ran: rJ2,[;zzR (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:29:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56183 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I think force-mode-line-update nowadays always forces update of all > visible mode lines, not just the one of the current buffer. > > Calling force-mode-line-update with ALL non-nil forces a more thorough > redisplay (because it sets a flag which causes redisplay not to trust > the contents of the displayed windows, not just their mode lines). > > IOW, (force-mode-line-update t) is a way to force the next redisplay > cycle do a more thorough job, it has nothing to do with mode lines per > se. I think it would be good if you could document this, because it's basically impossible to figure out what this function actually does from looking at its lisp definition.