From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59347: 29.0.50; `:family` face setting ignored Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:46:00 +0000 Message-ID: <7cc9e037861402e6b468@heytings.org> References: <83bkp4bfqf.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn7s9txp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmdk9pat.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz9j9zyu.fsf@gnu.org> <838rk77yfo.fsf@gnu.org> <834juu9aya.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786024fc72f3b@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39723"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 59347@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 20 20:47:06 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1owqHS-000A5q-Ed for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 20:47:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owqHP-0000s1-BG; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owqHO-0000rq-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owqHN-0008UO-Rz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:47:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owqHN-0008RT-N7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59347 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59347-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59347.166897356332366 (code B ref 59347); Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59347) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2022 19:46:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owqGQ-0008Px-NE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:51906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owqGP-0008PK-8i for 59347@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 14:46:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1668973560; bh=AggG3bNQRrPwrbByfNVyrrMcRn7Jk7E2j57TDmQbKA4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=kIKYre6xdQhIs4JemKXNTJDLWqVVWu6WHKfSgrgkZ6jbMZzkJdX204JiywnM2N9ke 57Jfy66tkYlzbBhjMUWRfm5DvbJ+xIG7hKCZOubu2aLMjtrwL+Rvs1bVvFVfBp52c9 4AIs3WhaKezzhD3ovmtf/O607BJxCxZLLjI8onBhdreg76l+qMYjm6VytiWW4BCdGa ekE0kXnxDhdqyJQntdhF0l5096v1RIMuNIWuiEuUQF0AUWW3iKZOjAaK4Uj0HtkT1e 8qMflAsaA/dA5aLXgh6fLz1LyE4utPYd7rvSBvzy5eiBqNmO2V+2QBGCFGGeo66DD2 WE+HLObZnUPig== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248466 Archived-At: >> Stefan, could you please try the attached patch and see if it fixes >> your problem? (It does here, with your recipe.) > > It works for me, indeed! > Great, thanks!