From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Scherer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37189: 25.4.1: vc-hg-ignore implementation is missing Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: <7b572ca5-69fc-7f02-e10b-1d1fe726c245@gmx.de> References: <1ba53ae2-42a4-3ab3-d4f2-2ceae565d198@gmx.de> <412195c1-e196-12af-933b-0312f5075847@yandex.ru> <57825d73-27a4-d5f5-8198-a172796a558a@gmx.de> <1ebc6077-9175-65ba-4996-282bb2c8eca5@yandex.ru> <6145d6f6-37a8-7166-731b-57669086b145@gmx.de> <838slmk90j.fsf@gnu.org> <83h806gp2w.fsf@gnu.org> <8336bmg1o9.fsf@gnu.org> <2354821b-5c1e-f9e3-3a64-4ff978ded33b@gmx.de> <83sgjkdev5.fsf@gnu.org> <3fb73dbc-bf31-233b-4afc-2147c4ffd5b7@gmx.de> <5622487d-a21f-49cf-5420-21f87415af4f@gmx.de> <83wo8ubfbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhdpqbas.fsf@gnu.org> <2c8419ae-723d-c7ae-a60e-59d1b1cbc2c1@gmx.de> <83o8u3r6wg.fsf@gnu.org> <6f3ba261-e1f9-cf19-cc22-ec8c24cf3298@gmx.de> <83d0air0bs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="87749"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 Cc: 37189@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 13 17:33:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HQw-000Mis-Kn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:33:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55464 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HQv-0007gn-DS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HOK-0006Ji-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HOI-0006gM-U6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HOI-0006fe-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HOI-0001JQ-7K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Wolfgang Scherer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37189 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37189-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37189.15816114465021 (code B ref 37189); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2020 16:30:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HO1-0001Iu-Os for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:30:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:50365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HO0-0001If-2s for 37189@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:30:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1581611437; bh=gOQ2+of8xFJWLyndPFPGG0YtuCvSZGL3ETKYTRf7bhs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=NQmOLMcn38VoTH/dLAlRMg99hud9/kZY+DT8IpYJr0PIwmvKUfT7nW/EohCEqHr/a OvaF52b7fqSC9VEprW8PZf6mpeeLC38hpvn73WIzW4bm3G0zeQZNTUNa62/ch0zHXG ml8MiViOHVZBj6kHFhRoYvD4NBniyQgk0mGMVtPo= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from sheckley.simul.de ([87.160.210.52]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mk0JM-1jmZPx2Pge-00kRxc; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:30:37 +0100 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sheckley.simul.de [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sheckley.simul.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EFFB19431D6; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:30:36 +0100 (CET) Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=Wolfgang.Scherer@gmx.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsDiBEb46IgRBACMHOAb1KNo1Ylk+ebri+4R+bG4tyKlqBlrpv8D9/ZwRdXSGt+0DyCHoaAd 7KW7noHapLe87DunABOjKG4nqTGv+dRiWuUBlp3I4aYRFDVa3Da+XnIYkMHKqhK59VEHQCdp Km42nuLS7TS+n99at9YwzTG6VBdOlBKTlRFngOjVLwCg1RGXJ6X3EjS1FKCQeXziURVpWlkD /2zY6Ayhxi62TS84VjikXrrmjXykAAaAmMVEyKKYb9L5pGlqiZz9g/K9xw1EUoZTYuaufquD v4rAGR58K/3V4CYfJLEeshMWiaXHvMmlxMznlG16/um4MvmR8B3r+cx0nOPK1JBdD2qrkNnF Mw8FB+zouLFB4Gt2IUC5IlOmZ8OQA/4qdU53CItzWsCr9Nux4L0qUlRweSmCnV8xGQ2wP5XI MawIQxxREvSrsYDG8cNnYETMg4iQFfIktwAoxCJvuFAwIB6ZxHGF4FcEZm64CXc2u7CmFLqt rVhXhIfMz9oEYC+HhGczGamn9ofbGTFd2hJEtPcQgWNR4f7+aKknmi2+OM0fV29sZmdhbmcg U2NoZXJlciA8d3NAc3ctYW10LndzPsJhBBMRAgAhBQJYmz3YAhsjBQsJCAcCBhUICQoLAgQW AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEIUCr3Gr112VZZoAoLTBSTp1qGuNhLdXY04iaWCMYmHCAJ4kHPtQ6nTw kEq9qCHgVgXDaY7wjs7ATQRG+OiIEAQAhi0wjcxvA4tychg2NQuwBIf9LX/46l+74+QbewCn a4a+mw/9s5KY In-Reply-To: <83d0air0bs.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:hPyiN0re3AZNSNHFZcXygSHC4D6F94qo5mjdrGHX6sA/LQzx9Td XRDcCSwOOxWoDO/NDk6aRDn0RYt7rAX6/hL2BkfXiA0OIHR2Eepaxi8DoblDC7b+PTSCYaX b3zYuYBCYj9mXAeAOEMBANaxR1lpv+3pdPKSDsZhD6l165yHO5+uUM+6NK+/naTpmMxRg1x 7nwUPpdw5WTr9XuNGu5XA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:FTDOBU92qBc=:nMMw23uVROvN03ZEkG2JuW 6JzZG9A0vZyqDXyiup7DSb9PkBDv8fhJbmu0eJgw+YWgJ3OkjD3pgtLiajETtEcwAPMjEcTjN U000Igdcfsnur0d7sEpaw/oxVZLkr8c/edaAzT/mmqb6jsfEHIhYxqpC+pWGXhHNG5BBPDxvN YqEM4+N10vCKo8W3maPOr5JIB214NG3FX8b2bDTuImggzBXhhJZfpzGDgqrJ7LdIB/uLLCmlO EF/1gM+t8+x4yLBB2fnw+8WJRXLsauJ3YcLEdfRmlz+TGIQA/0KY+howxMkSgKt0cKJnzBuqL 8x1gHBTgHWbAaDwTDMTBFh7KfzCPXud4OQOZKL5DkI8Mx6LCd04FLIk9nZp7sB8BD/bYzzci6 K+FAwVFtYZE4NtylwOr772C4N1ikC3uSvnqcmMViV0/HJ2KNs0lqfNE3vpOBsvN9NtAAbmzbF UR4WTiA92sZcTQ82rvU9RwLlqA2JmAa7fYxeUW9oZmFcmmpq3kX8Jc/vRmDTmDBGPR2TRqCF2 Z7rpauzXOQaxoNRunjQeQN4ObvygmffLjZPPPg1nK17g0GwdtTbNXXwiQ1i/UDcqGFmHCZNhC 4VF6G8IDijO4kZZ0iT7qP8MoEGtLWrpeMNLTBhuKa6jUevHiR/lqoTjY4yRQNzer351pwlq88 GXokwpw8bizL4Qj5mg+rcElUcWvJ08ZgJ2+xZLZJkk3EPcrmqAAv2yThmiMLTYyjTN7FRwTGd PU5EVeH4sbKM3XF8LaRDSxQwmq/+HclpHGU42GuAr2VF85R5g4/J8kSi5h/Mzui/rOmTlqUq X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176000 Archived-At: Dear Eli, Am 13.02.20 um 16:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> From: Wolfgang Scherer >> Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, 37189@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:18:00 +0100 >> >> I will now quit this absurd discussion of non-existing algorithms >> and just keep working with my correct implementation of the vc >> ignore feature. >> >> Should you get your facts straight, we can talk further. Otherwise, I >> have invested enough.time now. > This was exacerbated by your > frequently unkind language, like in the small excerpt above. This > made the discussion unpleasant, to say the least. I am sorry, if my wording made the discussion unpleasant for you. That was not my intent. It was really my misconception that you were more experienced than me regarding the code in the vc package, which made me doubt my reasoning. And if that happens, I tend to lash out, which is a personal flaw I sincerely apologize for. I do have to thank you for making me produce a much higher quality of code than I would have without the misunderstanding. So I may have not been pleased with the experience, but I am very pleased with the result. Thank you. > > I will remove your address from any further discussions of this issue, > per your wish. I hope the apology still reaches you.