From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:54:31 +0200 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7704-Wed18Feb2004205431+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <009901c3ec70$b3013940$6400a8c0@austin.rr.com> <7494-Sat14Feb2004140608+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <40336BFC.3060908@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077130935 16425 80.91.224.253 (18 Feb 2004 19:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, harald@maierh.de, rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 18 20:02:07 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AtWxS-00032D-00 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:02:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtWw3-0005ZW-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:00:39 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AtWrM-0003Og-4H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:55:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AtWqj-0003DB-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.22] (helo=gollum.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtWpx-0002qV-PD; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:54:21 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.153.239]) by gollum.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id CLR96823; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:54:17 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Jason Rumney X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <40336BFC.3060908@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:43:24 +0000) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:7009 gmane.emacs.windows:2046 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:7009 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:43:24 +0000 > From: Jason Rumney > > > >I agree. IIRC, 21.3 had a couple of annoying last-minute bugs. > > > Its a good idea if we can stick to a quick pretest cycle (a couple of > weeks at the most). Agreed. I think this should be possible because, as you said, the release branch didn't see commits for a long time. The hardest thing would be to find a victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer to do package the tarballs and deltas and generally supervise the release process.