From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65902: 29.0.92; emacsclient-mail.desktop fails due to complicated escaping Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:19:15 -0700 Message-ID: <75258dc0-4593-0dd2-f00d-965b37763fd4@gmail.com> References: <83ttrym8jx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34702"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Spencer Baugh , 65902@debbugs.gnu.org To: Spencer Baugh , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 13 18:20:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSbF-0008oL-KO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:20:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSat-0003Ql-Cp; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSar-0003QS-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSaq-0002R5-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSaw-0001Os-8u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65902 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65902-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65902.16946219735341 (code B ref 65902); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65902) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2023 16:19:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSaR-0001O3-Ve for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]:55552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgSaM-0001Nm-Jo for 65902@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 12:19:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-269304c135aso1077a91.3 for <65902@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694621955; x=1695226755; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OHDn5s8z/6fcimqjedTQ2kMb1v/0mmyEkORwPSLsM9s=; b=monkQVbF8KFt3yr5l9RUw2IxwDxVW7TGFE6+BBOJb0MBFCjYzWgTbNlA6jRztUXgBY Alcc2JTKUbxVY/3PsvMkwPeLFkkWk3YtUXGvF7kbb22RTvJicOFdrdFKrU8DdjnPFM3G 8KeKJVnrzYdiFpbqh6SHbEEMcBDPLNrsXcCTjP/p6+Vkz95mSHPIj0WQRKtYlSwlQkc+ vzGGE7G26cwyZQdgf2kZZJ7AsDts7fEZYNl22ijrUymgCjfMTiclsR033hE7SZtNFsA0 u4ijj0pn7DnJQEGD/hiEwxIVa8/x5MLOwH2KT82oi0wyyd0mH+AFbxTNZrnYJtTVUYhY 3a5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694621955; x=1695226755; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OHDn5s8z/6fcimqjedTQ2kMb1v/0mmyEkORwPSLsM9s=; b=MLRn7g+kD1XogMmnTz2zRm2kOIVdt9oP+C+tDXhOoSPxg0DC8wOWqDjwqFoO3K1Bcw 9fScbt8mVx0reXaiGpYGTAfi2b5PojsZ+RInHVHvkI4TDHFMImHTCtrfwPq2Kd3Hd+bS DUix7SdfjNArANjY3NhnoL1qXC6V3dwO8Hs2BgkgEmVJLJJ6FAD5vtMhHeVIWQFa4LTS JRfH2sRjA+JlwpLRXKRZ0SwhnnyRkX/IF2/uvyGgzrUxscuqGbM5dlQ5ZInCbb4BLDZr /zn1z7/aro8172AWZS+oMsWzpFJlUeCzgb7eH1C1uRz6rG5JEomopexOZlqNaCMyqQ9j ABOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyuPFyPEek1Q5I/wt33kzwOi4xx8MI2BVN7QYDRXQV0FN+kQlCe bFeWpAY0De89t+8uSf0GBIA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGNS8jd8xbl6b2MBvvpNcRXJQ0a92RlNxmKB8cbxomg3ZR7n2cjRd0MuciQqE2WrIpEAN7QDg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:192:b0:26d:d7f:6779 with SMTP id t18-20020a17090b019200b0026d0d7f6779mr2505449pjs.27.1694621955412; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lt12-20020a17090b354c00b00263154aab24sm1658196pjb.57.2023.09.13.09.19.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:270332 Archived-At: On 9/13/2023 8:23 AM, Spencer Baugh wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: >> AFAIU, there was no consensus reached there, so I'm unsure what are >> you alluding to here. > > Everyone in that thread agreed that something like this --apply design > (which passes the strings verbatim to Emacs without evaling them) is > what we need, they were just discussing the exact design, and in the end > the design that everyone who posted agreed on, matched what I have > implemented... I don't think we need to relitigate it. That was my impression as well. Most of the discussion in that bug was among Robert (already commenting on this bug in agreement with the current patch), Gregory (who I believe supports the --apply design[1]), Lars (who proposed a form of the --apply design to handle multiple --apply calls[2]), and me (I support --apply, using Lars' semantics if we can get it). [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57752#119 [2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57752#122