From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9300: 24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <74937597-35e0-4ee9-10dd-cc33eedfb084@yandex.ru> References: < <56CBAF58.2000708@yandex.ru> <3a64315c-fc72-42bd-a6cf-0fa43414daa6@default> <56CC32CD.5050906@yandex.ru> <27990eb0-3d4e-62c7-257d-7ea7a8204e2d@yandex.ru> <6635cd58-2d42-46fe-85b4-287f1e0eb05d@default> <05f0b24b-1a52-4fa4-9f22-f34f5ed33556@default> <503db28a-d430-8a5d-a26d-e95890da58b9@yandex.ru> <76b6983a-da47-48da-ba9b-20ede56ed691@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456501708 14234 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2016 15:48:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:48:28 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , 9300@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 16:48:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKcp-0002ZA-K0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:48:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKco-0002i1-SG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKHN-00080R-Rd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:26:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKHL-00075p-12 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKHK-00074b-NU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKHK-0006Yh-Gp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9300 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9300-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9300.145650033925178 (code B ref 9300); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9300) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2016 15:25:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47798 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKGx-0006Y2-5d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:33774) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZKGv-0006Xp-Uf for 9300@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:25:38 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id g62so76882200wme.0 for <9300@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:25:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BN8huYMNTLxtGw1kialrqlj9KZ0ZVeEkKGXOny2OYZ4=; b=Y262u1omMGpXmUG4EKHtcZsn9RC6rzlEa/XFnHaRUHp8czdo+LDzrC6erYLzYRUajh WZMJcONU9v2OeD73uYW46ihb0hiXce947cJZNmpGWMax+8uyKP+zithzzw5ZqPjCTmBN gENxPL4BCSHgRGlOmrk8KihBiWvjkH9Iqi58crHuw09v3egHcTegLK0i9yQbPgGBtth9 c9KpyfR50ITv/C1AVd/SFEBAAGaUM/nNm+Bnn3teB/q2aYQh6ox1DY8z9WIC0SK3TiuR bFBMGp4Lnd0ye9NQyeKXChGTtuZDFB50fj/7JzjkbrpVJWr9iupsDEO/RACMEFzPjADS Us9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BN8huYMNTLxtGw1kialrqlj9KZ0ZVeEkKGXOny2OYZ4=; b=k0W0PAtTJUIahzP2c/VXqKeKlxo0Wf9tNEHCYnwz86/0RveldXgi0LpS0M2qCdM3DD piPGm6llLFahd+aBDxrxkV8/YzCmoVpQBWxH0pgdvhGUY3Wg5LOU+hxe9GJNPYr0etI6 OVQK20JZ7jtCiNVaXZzlB8PcYbUtP2Jc46kxoDX1vN4+10Us0j++C/npToPfTahl2i1N Bkw+W38Qonr+ML5ye+WhEvEDNg0sbvYbXZXTt+SQl1WyHa7uJSMVwD0w6Im0VKsftxkw isqCxnhVyLcsR9PxmpjiQxnfzk1lA42+VmenwMCNmWcx3SXXWpHlD1KmBYWiqhossCRI kfjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJImokjy/DmlXg4yv/OMV6aF1b4WW2BKbRRyHC8xzm5Po6lvKYma11GNdWynqlaJ2Q== X-Received: by 10.28.173.71 with SMTP id w68mr3993839wme.88.1456500332315; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:25:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id et11sm12852755wjc.30.2016.02.26.07.25.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:25:30 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <76b6983a-da47-48da-ba9b-20ede56ed691@default> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113891 Archived-At: On 02/26/2016 04:39 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >> I never mentioned anything Eclipse-related in this bug. > > Sorry - "eclim". My bad, it is indeed Eclipse-related. As for the rest, my first comment here still seems to be an appropriate response. Maybe someone else would like to comment as well? > I have much better-behaving list-at-point code. It's in the > same file, if you are really interested. It always returns nil > if the cursor is not on a list (there is no list at point), > including when point is at eob. I'd be interested in a patch. Especially if it's orthogonal (as it should be) to whatever we decide in this bug.