From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>, 45072@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#45072: 28.0.50; Emacs switches other buffer back uncontrollably, if other window's buffer is changed by user during minibuffer editing
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73e2a032-d3e9-bc94-2f72-246096ce03cb@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnxqxdx5.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
> What do you type to accept a suggestion? I can't find a key
> to accept a suggestion without exiting the minibuffer.
When I type here
C-h f set- RET
I get a completions window with the "set-" prefixed completions. When I
now type
auto RET
the completions window pops down and the minibuffer window shows
set-auto-
When I now type another RET, the completions window pops up again and
shows the "set-auto-" prefixed completions with the minibuffer showing
set-auto-
When I now type an "m" I get a help window showing me help for
'set-auto-mode'.
So here the pop down works already and I have no idea why it cannot be
extended to the entire completion mechanism.
> Then maybe the commands that pop up the completions window
> should clean up their windows after use. What would be the
> right place to remove used windows? Maybe in exit-minibuffer?
> Or in some unwind-protect in case the user types C-g?
The completion mechanism should clean up its traces as soon as it is
finished - either a choice has been made or it has been aborted: This
can mean to clean up windows or frames, size back a minibuffer window or
remove a pop up menu or a dialogue box. But I hardly ever use that
mechanism so I cannot tell how it works (or should work) in practice.
In either case 'exit-minibuffer' is too late. It must be either the
caller of completions - just in case it wants to, for example, reuse the
present window for refining the list of completions - or the called
which might be more noisy with windows popping up and down. And I
suppose that completions are not invoked from minibuffer interactions
alone ...
> This means that quit-window should be used on the completions window.
> It should do the right thing: either restore a previous buffer in that window,
> or close the window if no more buffers were displayed in it.
Yes. But IMO that should be done _before_ reading from the minibuffer
interaction finished.
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-06 14:07 bug#45072: 28.0.50; Emacs switches other buffer back uncontrollably, if other window's buffer is changed by user during minibuffer editing Jean Louis
2020-12-07 16:10 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-12-07 16:42 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-07 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-07 18:49 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-07 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-07 19:45 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 8:09 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-08 14:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-12-08 14:18 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 14:47 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-08 14:58 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 16:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-08 16:14 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 15:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-09 9:33 ` martin rudalics
2021-08-03 7:57 ` Juri Linkov
2021-08-04 6:52 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-04 8:39 ` Juri Linkov
2021-08-04 8:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-04 20:17 ` Juri Linkov
2021-08-05 10:55 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-05 23:36 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-08 19:15 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-09 9:34 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-09 10:06 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-09 15:16 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-09 19:11 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-10 7:44 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 8:30 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10 9:46 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 10:16 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10 11:52 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 12:07 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-11 9:39 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-12 1:47 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10 8:32 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-10 9:47 ` martin rudalics [this message]
2020-12-10 10:21 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10 11:52 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 12:21 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-12 20:49 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-13 7:26 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-14 20:28 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-15 7:59 ` martin rudalics
2021-01-15 8:57 ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-19 13:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-19 16:02 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-19 18:09 ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-19 13:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-19 16:02 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-19 16:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-19 17:11 ` martin rudalics
2020-12-08 5:33 ` Richard Stallman
2020-12-08 15:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73e2a032-d3e9-bc94-2f72-246096ce03cb@gmx.at \
--to=rudalics@gmx.at \
--cc=45072@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=bugs@gnu.support \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).